Arbitrary Units (AU)
Also known as: Session Load, Foster Load, Internal Training Load
The primary internal-load number for a session: sRPE multiplied by actual duration in minutes. AU produces one comparable load score across strength, endurance, mobility, and skill sessions, something tonnage cannot do because it only exists for sessions that lift external weight.
Formula
sessionAU = sRPE x actualDurationMin [Foster sRPE method]Example
60-minute strength session at sRPE 7 = 420 AU. 45-minute easy run at sRPE 4 = 180 AU. 30-minute mobility at sRPE 3 = 90 AU. Total day: 690 AU.
How Afitpilot Uses This
AU is the headline number on the session card, bigger than tonnage. Tonnage stays visible as a secondary, strength-specific row. We sum AU across the week (see Weekly AU) and split by modality. Historical sessions without an actual duration are backfilled using planned duration as a stand-in and flagged with an asterisk so coaches don't over-trust them.
AU benchmarks across sports
| Who / Context | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Recreational lifter (3 sessions/week) | 300-500 AU per session | 1,000-1,800 AU/week is sustainable indefinitely |
| Endurance athlete (training block) | 500-900 AU per session | Long rides/runs push AU high via duration, not just sRPE |
| Hybrid athlete | 2,500-4,500 AU/week | Strength + cardio composes well in AU; tonnage cannot do this |
| Foster's original cohort | sRPE x min, threshold ~6,000 AU/week | Above which monotony and strain warnings start to apply in his framework |
Known Limitations
- •Two sessions with identical AU can be physiologically very different. A 30-minute sprint workout at sRPE 8 (240 AU) is not the same stimulus as a 60-minute steady-state ride at sRPE 4 (240 AU), even though AU treats them as equal.
- •Estimated AU (planned duration in place of actual) is only as good as how well athletes followed the planned time. A session that ran 50% over plan is mis-scored under estimation.
- •AU does not capture proximity to failure for strength work, RIR and per-exercise RPE still matter for that. AU complements those metrics rather than replacing them.
- •Coach commentary that talked about tonnage trends has not all been re-pointed at AU yet, some legacy summary surfaces still emphasise tonnage.
What We're Improving
Science Context
AU was introduced by Foster et al. (2001) as a way to translate sRPE into a quantitative load score. The choice of "arbitrary units" was deliberate, Foster wanted to discourage cross-cohort comparison and emphasise within-athlete trends. Per Impellizzeri's 2020 review, AU is now considered the most generalisable internal-load metric across sport types, and is the foundation on which downstream constructs (acute load, chronic load, monotony, strain) are built.